Table 5.
Traditional southern Chinese pattern score | Western pattern score | Grains–vegetables pattern score | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | Q4 | Q1 | Q4 | Q1 | Q4 | |||||||
(reference) | OR | 95 % CI | P | (reference) | OR | 95 % CI | P | (reference) | OR | 95 % CI | P | |
Model 1 | 1·00 | 1·12 | 0·94, 1·38 | 0·14 | 1·00 | 2·27 | 1·54, 3·51 | <0·001 | 1·00 | 0·36 | 0·26, 0·48 | <0·001 |
Model 2 | 1·00 | 1·03 | 0·81, 1·28 | 0·38 | 1·00 | 2·02 | 1·35, 3·11 | <0·01 | 1·00 | 0·65 | 0·58, 0·72 | <0·05 |
Model 3 | 1·00 | 0·94 | 0·78, 1·11 | 0·50 | 1·00 | 1·83 | 1·21, 2·81 | <0·05 | 1·00 | 0·84 | 0·77, 0·93 | <0·05 |
Q1, lowest quartile of dietary patterns (reference); Q4: highest quartile of dietary patterns.
Model 1: adjusted for gender and age (continuous).
Model 2: further adjusted for income (continuous), education level (<high school, high school, >high school), physical activity level (light, moderate, heavy), smoking status (never, current, former), BMI (continuous), type 2 diabetes mellitus (yes/no) and hypertension (yes/no).
Model 3: further adjusted for total energy intake.