Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Psychosom Med. 2020 Jun;82(5):454–460. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0000000000000811

Table 2.

Regression models of the relationship between baseline cerebral blood flow composites and cardiometabolic risk at two-year follow-up

Model 1 Model 2 Model 3
Baseline Frontostriatal CBF 0.26 ** 0.26 ** 0.26 **
[0.08, 0.44] [0.08, 0.44] [0.07, 0.45]
Baseline Frontoparietal CBF 0.01 0.01 −0.03
[−0.16, 0.18] [−0.17, 0.18] [−0.22, 0.15]
Baseline Insular-Subcortical CBF −0.07 −0.07 −0.07
[−0.25, 0.11] [−0.25, 0.11] [−0.25, 0.12]
Baseline Cardiometabolic Risk 0.68 *** 0.68 *** 0.68 ***
[0.55, 0.81] [0.54, 0.81] [0.54, 0.82]
Baseline Total CBF −0.03 0.01
[−0.16, 0.11] [−0.14, 0.15]
Age −0.01
[−0.16, 0.14]
Sex −0.23
[−0.55, 0.08]
Race 0.01
[−0.30, 0.32]
Education 0.03
[−0.13, 0.19]
N 109 109 109
R2 0.54 0.54 0.55

Standardized regression coefficients are reported with the 95% confidence interval below in brackets. Each model is adjusted for cardiometabolic risk at baseline. Model 1 is unadjusted for any further covariates. Model 2 is adjusted for total cerebral blood flow at baseline. Model 3 is also adjusted for age, sex, race, and education. CBF = Cerebral blood flow;

***

p < 0.001;

**

p < 0.01;

*

p < 0.05.