Skip to main content
. 2020 May 8;22(6):819–829. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noaa052

Table 1.

In vitro P-gp activity of entrectinib, larotrectinib, and crizotinib in LLC-PK1 cells stably transfected with human or mouse P-gp

In vitro P-gp activity (human) In vitro P-gp activity (mouse)
ER AP-ER PappAB nM/sec ± SD PappBA    nM/sec ± SD Papp,inhAB    nM/sec ± SD ER AP-ER PappAB    nM/sec ± SD PappBA    nM/sec ± SD Papp,inhAB    nM/sec ± SD
Entrectinib 15 [++] 1.1 [-] 13.5 ± 3.4 197 ± 5 15.2 ± 1.9 26 [++] 1.5 [-] 9.90 ± 0.4 255 ± 19 14.6 ± 0.9
Larotrectinib 10 [++] 2.8 [+] 18.5 182 ± 37 51.9 ± 1.4 20 [++] 6.3 [+] 8.20 ± 0.7 161 ± 7 51.5 ± 2.1
Crizotinib 28 [++] 3.5 [+] 13.8 ± 0.3 388 ± 17 47.9 ± 10.5 29 [++] 4.9 [+] 12.0 ± 1.5 344 ± 16.8 58.6 ± 15.6
Digoxin a 11 [++] 3.9 [+] 10.9 ± 0.7 121 ± 7.3 42.0 ± 2.3 10 [++] 3.4 [+] 12.2 ± 1.0 125 ± 2.8 41.0 ± 3.8

[++] denotes very strong, [+] strong, or [-] weak substrate for P-gp. aDigoxin is an in vitro benchmark P-gp substrate, used as a control for the assay. ER was calculated from PappAB and PappBA (Equation 2); AP-ER was calculated from PappAB   and   Papp,inhAB (Equation 3). A→B, apical-to-basolateral direction; AP-ER, apical efflux ratio; B→A, basolateral-to-apical direction; ER, efflux ratio; Papp, apparent permeability; Papp,inh, apparent permeability in the presence of a P-gp inhibitor (zosuquidar); P-gp, P-glycoprotein; SD, standard deviation.