Table 1.
Invitees, n = 5979 | Participants FIT only, n = 1952 | Participants FIT and FHQ, n = 2379 | Participants FHQ only, n = 95 | Non-participants, n = 1553 | p Valuea | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Year of birth | ||||||
1941 | 769 (12.9%) | 290 (14.8%) | 256 (10.8%) | 10 (10.5%) | 213 (13.7%) | 0.02 |
1945 | 967 (16.2%) | 314 (16.1%) | 385 (16.2%) | 18 (18.9%) | 250 (16.1%) | |
1953 | 1329 (22.2%) | 429 (22.0%) | 564 (23.7%) | 21 (22.1%) | 315 (20.3%) | |
1955 | 1422 (23.8%) | 441 (22.6%) | 584 (24.5%) | 24 (25.3%) | 373 (24.0%) | |
1957 | 1492 (24.9%) | 478 (24.5%) | 590 (24.8%) | 22 (23.2%) | 402 (25.9%) | |
Sex | ||||||
Male | 2957 (49.5%) | 906 (46.4%) | 1180 (49.6%) | 47 (49.5%) | 824 (53.1%) | 0.002 |
Female | 3022 (50.5%) | 1046 (53.6%) | 1199 (50.4%) | 48 (50.5%) | 729 (46.9%) | |
Socioeconomicb status | ||||||
Low | 193 (3.2%) | 74 (3.8%) | 55 (2.3%) | 5 (5.3%) | 59 (3.8%) | 0.007 |
Average | 1657 (27.7%) | 542 (27.7%) | 677 (28.5%) | 19 (20.0%) | 419 (27.0%) | |
High | 1543 (25.8%) | 513 (26.3%) | 588 (24.7%) | 22 (23.2%) | 420 (27.0%) | |
Very high | 2401 (40.2%) | 763 (39.1%) | 1000 (42.0%) | 48 (50.5%) | 590 (38.0%) | |
Missing | 185 (3.1%) | 60 (3.1%) | 59 (2.5%) | 1 (1.0%) | 65 (4.2%) |
ap Values were calculated using Chi-square test statistic, comparing participants in the three groups and non-participants, excluding missing.
bBased on postal code areas.