Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 29;21:100176. doi: 10.1016/j.scog.2020.100176

Table 2.

Study 1 – risk perception across groups.

Paranoia
Anxiety
HC
Group comparisons
(n = 30) (n = 21) (n = 52)
Neutral: Likelihood 3.97 (1.41) 4.37 (0.89) 4.04 (1.18) F(2) = 0.75, SS = 2.14, p = 0.475
Neutral: Harm 2.00a (1.09) 1.41b (0.62) 1.18b (0.37) F(2) = 12.89, SS = 12.33, p < 0.001, ηp2 = 0.21
Neutral: Controllability 3.13 (1.37) 3.11 (1.32) 3.14 (1.62) F(2) = 0.003, SS = 0.02, p = 0.997
Neutral: Intentionality 3.48 (1.50) 3.31 (1.38) 3.30 (1.70) F(2) = 0.13, SS = 0.65, p = 0.878
Negative: Likelihood 3.80a (1.14) 3.70a (1.27) 2.90b (1.22) F(2) = 6.55, SS = 19.11, p = 0.002, ηp2 = 0.117
Negative: Harm 3.66 (1.26) 3.71 (1.69) 3.08 (1.50) F(2) = 2.10, SS = 9.15, p = 0.128
Negative: Controllability 2.86 (1.28) 2.87 (1.22) 2.94 (1.27) F(2) = 0.042, SS = 0.13, p = 0.959
Negative: Intentionality 3.59 (1.23) 3.36 (1.29) 3.00 (1.45) F(2) = 1.85, SS = 6.83, p = 0.162

Note: a, b represent significant post-hoc differences with a > b.