Skip to main content
. 2020 May 19;12(5):1465. doi: 10.3390/nu12051465

Table 3.

Summary of key results—comparison of outcome measures between pre- and post-implementation cohorts.

Outcome Measure/NHMRC a Grade of Recommendation Pre-Implementation (N = 98) Post-Implementation (N = 34) p Value *
N (%) N (%)
Process Nutrition screening (Grade B) <0.001 **
Screened with validated tool 14 (14) 30 (88)
Nutritional assessment (Grade B)
Nutritional assessment with validated tool on dietitian review
 - pre-treatment 73 (85) 33 of 33 (100) 0.018 **
 - during treatment 3 (3) 26 of 34 (79) <0.001 **
 - end treatment 5 (6) 15 of 34 (54) <0.001 **
 - post-treatment (T1) 2 (3) 22 of 29 (73) <0.001 **
 - post-treatment (T2) 3 (6) 14 of 20 (67) <0.001 **
 - post-treatment (T3) 3 (9) 10 of 17 (59) <0.001 **
Dietitian Appointment Schedule (Grade A)
Received recommended dietitian assessment
 - pre-treatment 20 (20) 33 (97) <0.001 **
 - weekly during treatment 47 (48) 20 (59) 0.275 **
 - fortnightly for 6 weeks post-treatment 12 (12) 4 (12) 0.864 **
Clinical Radiotherapy delivered as planned 0.041
No 11 (11) 0 (0)
Yes 87 (89) 34 (100)
Systemic therapy delivered as planned 0.005
No 17 (33) 0 (0)
Yes 34 (67) 18 (100)
Weight change during treatment, % 0.432 **
Mean (SD) −5.9 (4.2) −4.6 (5.3)
BMI b post-treatment, kg/m2 0.989 **
 - Mean (SD) 24.3 (5.6) 24.3 (4.1)
System Dietitian resources—occasions of service 0.613 **
Mean (SD) 13.1 (9.8) 14.1 (7.1)
Unplanned admission 0.499
No 54 (55) 21 (62)
Yes 44 (45) 13 (38)
Unplanned admission—reason 0.067
Treatment toxicity—nutrition/hydration 20 (45) 3 (23)
Treatment toxicity—other 14 (32) 7 (54)
Social circumstances 3 (7) 3 (23)
Other 7 (16) 0 (0)

a NHMRC = National Health and Medical Research Council; b BMI—Body Mass Index; * χ2 of independence; ** t-test.