Table 3.
Factors | Model One | Model Two | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Exp (B) | 95.0% CI for Exp (B) | p Value | Exp (B) | 95.0% CI for Exp (B) | p Value | |||
Lower | Upper | Lower | Upper | |||||
Dietary pattern (reference: Cluster Three) | ||||||||
Cluster One | 1.995 | 1.542 | 2.581 | <0.001 | 1.356 | 0.972 | 1.893 | 0.073 |
Cluster Two | 2.677 | 1.816 | 3.944 | <0.001 | 1.601 | 1.000 | 2.563 | 0.050 |
Residential area (reference: Metropolitan) | ||||||||
Rural | 0.667 | 0.480 | 0.926 | 0.016 | 1.004 | 0.680 | 1.482 | 0.984 |
Urban | 0.748 | 0.540 | 1.037 | 0.081 | 0.877 | 0.601 | 1.282 | 0.498 |
CI: confidence interval. p values were determined by complex sample multiple logistic regression analysis. Cluster One: diet dominant in fruits and fish; Cluster Two: diet dominant in meats; Cluster Three: diet dominant in white rice and kimchi. Model One was unadjusted, but, involved of dietary pattern and residential area together. Model Two was adjusted for gender (men = 1, women = 0), age (continuous), marital status (living alone = 1, living together = 0), education (≤elementary school = 3, middle school = 2, high school = 1, ≥college = 0), income (low = 3, low-medium = 2, high-medium = 1, high = 0), muscular exercise (no = 1, yes = 0), smoking status (current smoking = 1, past / non-smoking = 0), high-risk drinking (no = 1, yes = 0), hypertension (no = 1, yes = 0), diabetes mellitus (no = 1, yes = 0), dyslipidemia (no = 1, yes = 0), arthritis (no = 1, yes = 0), and body mass index (continuous).