Skip to main content
. 2020 May 13;5:100035. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2020.100035

Table 3.

Comparing the SS prediction accuracy of Splice2Deep and state-of-the-art tools using five well-studied organisms. Results in bold represent the best performing model. N/A indicates that the tool has not and cannot be trained for that specific organism.

Organism Gene-Splicer Splice-Predictor DeepSS Splicerover Splice2Deep
AcSS Homo sapiens 83.31 88.01 94.85 95.35 96.91
Arabidopsis thaliana 87.76 92.13 N/A 94.35 95.21
Oryza sativa japonica 84.21 89.42 N/A N/A 93.89
Drosophila melanogaster 88.66 88.69 N/A N/A 94.07
Caenorhabditis elegans N/A N/A 93.32 N/A 98.08
DoSS Homo sapiens 79.48 88.2 94.76 96.18 97.38
Arabidopsis thaliana 90.85 92.49 N/A 94.25 95.59
Oryza sativa japonica 86.17 87.5 N/A N/A 94.33
Drosophila melanogaster 90.19 88.79 N/A N/A 90.52
Caenorhabditis elegans N/A N/A 94.01 N/A 97.68