Skip to main content
. 2020 May 29;16(4):727–741. doi: 10.5114/aoms.2019.86928

Table II.

GRADE Summary of findings: effect of citalopram on QT interval in adults with mental disorders

Outcome Risk with intervention per 1000 Risk with comparator per 1000 Relative measure of association No. of participants (studies) Quality (GRADE) Comments
QTc > 30 ms, 3 weeks 74 11 RR = 6.85 (0.86–54.59) 186 (1 RCT) [96] Very low No difference
QTc > 60 ms 33 0 RR = 3.19 (0.14–75.49) 62 (1 RCT) [107] Very low No difference
QTc > 450 ms for men or > 470 ms for women, 3 weeks 32 11 RR = 2.94 (0.31–27.71) 186 (1 RCT) [96] Very low No difference
QTc > 500 ms 0 0 RR inestimable 62 (1 RCT) [107] Very low No difference
QTC [ms] NR NR MD = 6.56 (0.07–13.04) 892 (6 RCTs) [7, 71, 94, 96, 107] Moderate Favors control
QTc ≥ 450 ms, adults with predialysis CKD NR NR Adjusted OR = 1.80 (1.00–3.10) 3252 (1 observational study) [112] Low Favors control
QT prolongation NR NR Adjusted MD = 0.10 (0.02–0.18) 38397 (1 observational study) [86] Low Favors control
QT prolongation NR NR Adjusted OR = 4.38 (1.45–13.30) 6790 (1 observational study) [87] Low Favors control
Sudden death with cardiovascular disease NR NR Adjusted OR = 1.81 (0.81–4.03) 4040 (1 observational study) [76] Low No difference
Sudden death without cardiovascular disease NR NR Adjusted OR = 1.70 (0.50–5.99) 4040 (1 observational study) [76] Low No difference

Population: adults with mental disorders, Settings: any, Intervention: citalopram, any dose, Comparator: placebo or no active drug. Boldface indicates statistically significant differences at 95% CI. We concluded that there is no difference in outcomes between active and control interventions based on p-value > 0.05 and inability to reject null hypotheses but without post hoc analysis of the statistical power to detect true differences. GRADE – Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation, NR – not reported, OR – odds ratio, RCT – randomized controlled trial, RR – relative risk. Between studies differences in continuous outcomes: MD – mean difference in absolute values of continuous outcomes between intervention and comparator, SMD – standardized mean difference between intervention and comparator where the magnitude of the effect is defined as small (SMD, 0–0.5 standard deviations), moderate (SMD, 0.5–0.8 standard deviations), and large (SMD > 0.8 standard deviations).