Table 5.
Area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves shows moderate diagnostic utility of selected models
| EAU risk groups | CUETO score | CUETO risk groups | EORTC score | EORTC risk groups | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Recurrence | ||||||
| This study | 1‐year RFS | 0.633 | 0.566 | 0.461 | 0.670 | 0.646 |
| 5‐year RFS | 0.652 | 0.539 | 0.484 | 0.693 | 0.678 | |
| Kılınç et al (2017) 45 —5‐year RFS | — | — | — | 0.773 | ||
| Hernandez et al (2011) 46 —1‐year RFS | — | — | — | 0.61 | ||
| Hernandez et al (2011)—5‐year RFS | — | — | — | 0.70 | ||
| Choi et al (2014) 43 —5‐year RFS | 0.894 | — | 0.832 | — | ||
| Progression | ||||||
| This study | 1‐year PFS | 0.821 | 0.674 | 0.770 | 0.803 | 0.801 |
| 5‐year PFS | 0.805 | 0.664 | 0.728 | 0.802 | 0.788 | |
| Kılınç et al (2017)—5‐year PFS | — | — | — | 0.901 | ||
| Hernandez et al (2011)—1‐year PFS | — | — | — | 0.58 | ||
| Hernandez et al (2011)—5‐year PFS | — | — | — | 0.55 | ||
| Choi et al (2014)—5‐year PFS | 0.724 | — | 0.722 | — | ||
The sensitivity and specificity metrics were calculated for each point as a threshold. ROC curves for our subgroup were shown in Figure S1.