Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jun 10.
Published in final edited form as: Semin Cancer Biol. 2017 Dec 15;51:36–49. doi: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2017.12.004

Table 1.

Prognostic and predictive DNA methylation biomarkers for colorectal cancer.

Gene /panel Material Cancer samples Stage Effect of methylation Survival / Response Method Ref
APC1A, CDKN2A, RASSF1A Tissue 111 I-IV Poor survival *RR = 2.20, P = .037 Pyrosequencing [174]
AGBL4, FLI1, TWIST1 Plasma 353 I-IV Poor DFS HR= 2.00, P = .001 MALDI-TOF [175]
*HR = 0.495, P = .495
CDKN2A Tissue 902 I-IV Poor OS HR = 1.36, P = .004 qMSP [176]
*HR = 1.03, P = .78
CDKN2A Tissue 111 I-IV Poor survival P = .036 Pyrosequencing [174]
*P = .065
CDKN2A, KRAS mut Tissue 86 I-III Poor OS *HR = 3.0, P = .036 MSP [177]
CDKN2A, NEUROG Tissue 497 (FOLFOX) II-III Worse OS *HR = 2.89, P = .002 qMSP [178]
CDX2 Tissue 72 I-IV Poor OS *HR = 3.02, P = .030 MSP [179]
CIMP Tissue 1035 I-IV Poor OS *HR = 1.89, P < .001 qMSP [39]
Poor TTR *HR = 1.86, P < .001
CIMP Tissue 206 I-IV Poor OS P = .029 qMSP [33]
*CIMP not included
CIMP Tissue 734 I-IV Poor OS P = .009, *P = .451 qMSP [34]
Poor DFS P = .008, *P = .337
CIMP Tissue 190 (cohort 1) I-IV Poor CSS *HR = 1.84, P > .05 qMSP [35]
574 (cohort 2) *HR = 1.10, P > .05
CIMP Tissue 272 (MSS) I-IV Poor relative survival *HR = 2.90, P = .001 MSP [36]
CIMP Tissue 649 I-IV Improved CSS *HR = 0.44, P < .05 qMSP [32]
CIMP Tissue 24 (CIMP+) II-III 5-FU improved survival P = .022 qMSP [40]
100 (CIMP−) 5-FU no survival benefit P = .988
CIMP Tissue 67 (CIMP+) III 5-FU improved survival P = .002 MSP [41]
140 (CIMP−) 5-FU no survival benefit P = .60
CIMP Tissue 615 III Poor OS HR = 1.36, P = .044 qMSP [42]
*P = .031
CIMP Tissue 145 (CIMP+) III IFL (vs 5-FU/LV) improved OS HR = 0.62, P = .07 qMSP [42]
470 (CIMP−) IFL (vs FU/LV) worse OS HR = 1.38, P = .049
CIMP Tissue 12 (CIMP+) II-III 5-FU worse DFS P = .023 MSP [46]
38 (CIMP−) 5-FU no survival benefit P = .146
CIMP/MLH1 Tissue 115 II Poor DFS *HR = 3.16, P = .011 qMSP [180]
Poor OS *HR = 4.70, P = .002
CREB1 Tissue 33 (rectum) II-III Predictive of lower response to radiation P = .031(histology) qMSP [181]
DIRAS1 Tissue 146 I-IV Poor OS P = .012 MSP [182]
FOXE1 Tissue 396 I-IV Poor OS P = .008 Illumina HM450 [183]
HLTF Serum 103 IV Poor OS *HR = 1.8, P = .04 qMSP [49]
HLTF Serum 77 I-IV Poor OS RR = 3.0, P = .008 qMSP [184]
HOPX Tissue 170 III Poor DSS *HR = 1.40, P = .035 qMSP [185]
HPP1 Plasma 467 IV Poor OS HR = 1.86, P < .05 qMSP [48]
HPP1 Plasma (after therapy initiated) 467 IV Predictive of non-responders to bevacizumab comb therapy AUC = 0.77, NPV = 97.7 (RECIST) qMSP [48]
HPP1 Serum 103 IV Poor OS *HR = 1.6, P < .05 qMSP [49]
HPP1 Serum 77 I-IV Poor OS RR = 5.1, P = .001 qMSP [184]
HPP1, HLTF Serum 77 I-IV Poor OS *RR = 3.4, P = .007 qMSP [184]
IGFBP3 Tissue 34 (training) II Improved RFS *HR = 6.46, P = .012 qMSP [186]
81 (validation) *HR = 2.40, P = .029
IGFBP3 Tissue 425 II-III Improved DFS *HR = 0.49, P < .01 Pyrosequencing [47]
IGFBP3 Tissue 89 (methylated) II-III Chemotherapy no survival benefit P = .20 Pyrosequencing [47]
157 (unmethylated) Chemotherapy survival benefit P = .040
KISS1 Tissue 100 (validation 1) I-III Poor DSS and OS P = .034 (DSS), P = .015 (OS) MSP, BGS [187]
190 (validation 2) P = .030 (DSS)
MGMT Plasma 49 (TMZ) IV Improved PFS P = .008 MethylBEAMing [53]
MGMT Tissue 68 IV Improved response to dacarbazine DCR = 44% (methylated), DCR = 6% (unmethylated), P = .012 MSP [188]
MGMT Tissue 61 (training) IV Improved response to alkylating agents PPV = 0.67, NPV = 0.89 (RECIST) MethylBEAMing [53]
21 (validation) PPV = 0.5, NPV = 0.67 (RECIST)
MGMT Tissue 111 I-IV Improved survival *RR = .36, P = .023 Pyrosequencing [174]
MLH1 Tissue 195 I-IV Improved OS *HR = .56, P = .01 MS-MLPA [189]
PCDH10, SPARC, UCHL1 Tissue 71 (5-FU/LV) II Poor DFS and OS P = .069 (DFS), P = .139 (OS) qMSP [190]
72 (surveillance) Improved DFS and OS P = .031 (DFS), P = .003 (OS)
RARb2 Tissue 73 I-IV Poor OS P = .026 MSP [191]
RET Tissue 233 (series 1) II Poor OS *HR = 2.46, P < .05 MSP, pyrosequencing [192]
231 (series 2) *HR = 1.13, P > .05
294 (series 3) *HR = 1.91, P < .05
SEPT9 Serum (after 1y follow-up) 137 II-III Poor CSS *HR = 2.69, P < .05 qMSP [193]
SFRP2 Tissue 77 I-IV Poor OS *HR = 5.15, P = .041 MSP [194]
SHISA3 Tissue 120 (OS) I-IV Poor OS *HR = 2.9, P = .002 Pyrosequencing [195]
83 (DFS) II-III Poor DFS *HR = 4.0, P = .003
SLFN11 Tissue 128 T1-T4/N0-N2 Poor OS *HR = 0.44, P = .022 MSP [196]
Poor RFS *HR = 0.44, P = .023
SYK Tissue 139 I-IV Poor OS *HR = 1.77, P = .001 MSP [197]
SYNPO2 Tissue 31 (training) I-IV Poor DSS and OS P = 0.132 (DSS) MSP, BGS [198]
100 (validation 1) II P = .046 (DSS), P = .031 (OS)
48 (validation 2) II-III P = .012 (DSS), P = .009 (OS)
TAC1 Serum (after 6 months follow-up) 144 II-III Poor CSS *HR = 4.12, P ≤ .001 qMSP [193]
Poor DFS *HR = 5.72, P < .001
TFAP2E Tissue 74 (cohort I) IV Lower response to 5-FU P < .001 (RECIST) qMSP [51]
36 (cohort II) IV P < .001 (RECIST)
42 (cohort III) P < .001 (histology)
68 (cohort IV) P < .001 (histology)
TFAP2E Tissue 193 I-III Improved OS *HR = 2.24, P = .025 MS-HRM [199]
Improved RFS *HR = 2.44, P = .025
TFAP2E Tissue 154 (chemotherapy) II-III Improved OS *HR = 2.55, P = .017 MS-HRM [199]
Improved RFS *HR = 2.36, P = .032
WNT5A Tissue 126 (treated with 5-FU) I-IV Improved PFS P < .005 MSP [52]
WRN Tissue 88 (treated with irinotecan) NA Improved OS P < .001 MSP [200]

Abbreviations: BGS, bisulfite genomic sequencing; COBRA, combined bisulfite restriction analysis; DCR, disease control rate (= partial response+ stable disease); DFS, disease free survival; DSS, disease specific survival; HR, hazard ratio; MSP, methylation specific PCR; MSS, microsatellite stable; NA, not available; NPV. Negative predictive value; OS, overall survival; PFS, progression free survival; PPV, positive predictive value; qMSP, quantitative methylation specific PCR; RECIST, response evaluation criteria in solid tumors; RFS, recurrence/relapse-free survival; RR, relative risk; TTR, time to recurrence.

*

Multivariate.