TABLE VIII.B.
Evidence for the role of nasal endoscopy in the diagnosis of allergic rhinitis
| Study | Year | LOE | Study design | Study groups | Clinical endpoint | Conclusion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hamizan et al.786 | 2016 | 3b | Cross-sectional | Adults with rhinitis and nasal obstruction | Nasal endoscopy, allergy testing | MT edema is a useful nasal endoscopic feature to predict presence of inhalant allergy. |
| White et al.785 | 2014 | 3b | Cross-sectional | Adults with isolated MT polypoid edema | Nasal endoscopy, allergy testing | Isolated MT polypoid edema is associated with positive allergy testing. |
| Eren et al.783 | 2013 | 4 | Case series | Adults with rhinitis | Nasal endoscopy, AR diagnosis | Nasal endoscopic findings do not provide reliable diagnosis of AR. |
| Ameli et al.782 | 2011 | 4 | Case series | Children with suspected AR | Nasal endoscopy, AR diagnosis | Inferior or middle turbinate septal contact was predictive for AR, whereas pale turbinates were not. |
| Jareoncharsri et al.784 | 1999 | 4 | Case series | Adults and children with PAR | Nasal endoscopy, nasal symptoms | No significant correlation between individual symptoms and endoscopic findings. |
AR = allergic rhinitis; LOE = level of evidence; MT = middle turbinate; PAR = perennial allergic rhinitis.