Skip to main content
. 2020 May 21;7:100926. doi: 10.1016/j.mex.2020.100926

Table 3.

Validation results for fortified equine urine samples (n = 26).

No Analyte Transition (m/z) eLODb (ng mL−1) Cvalc (ng mL−1) CCβ Relative cut-off factor (RFm)d (%) Sensitivitye (%)
1 AC-262536 279.2 > 195.0 0.03 1 <Cval 69 100
2 Andarine (S-4)a 440.2 > 150.0 0.06 2 <Cval 76 96
3 Bicalutamidea 429.2 > 255.0 0.02 1 <Cval 74 96
4 BMS-564929 306.1 > 96.0 1.5 5 <Cval 66 100
5 GLPG0492 390.2 > 118.0 0.09 1 <Cval 60 96
6 LGD-2226 393.1 > 241.1 0.18 1 >Cval N/A N/A
7 LGD-4033 337.1 > 267.2 0.007 1 <Cval 64 96
8 Ly2452473 375.2 > 272.1 0.002 1 <Cval 17.2 96
9 Ostarine (S-22)a 388.1 > 118.0 0.004 1 <Cval 75 96
10 PF-06260414 303.1 > 232.1 0.04 1 <Cval 69 100
11 RAD140 394.1 > 223.1 0.05 1 <Cval 37.1 96
12 S-1a 401.1 > 261.1 0.01 1 <Cval 93 96
13 S-6a 435.1 > 145.0 0.21 1 <Cval 34.0 100
14 S-9a 417.2 > 261.2 0.08 1 <Cval 46.6 100
15 S-23a 415.2 > 145.0 0.11 1 <Cval 53 100
a

Values calculated response-based.

b

Estimated LOD (S/N≥3).

c

Screening target concentration.

d

Calculated as percentage based on the ratio of the cut-off factor and the mean response of fortified samples.

e

Expressed as percentage based on the ratio of samples detected as positive in true positive samples, following fortification.