Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 7;6(6):e04092. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04092

Table 4.

Implant Dosimetry achieved for all patients, those with a recognizable DIL on pathology and those without a DIL. Values are given as median (Inter-Quartile-Range).

Dosimetric Value All Patients [n = 455] DIL present [n = 396] No DIL present [n = 59] p-value∗
Needles 28 (26–30) 28 (26–30) 28 (26–30) 0.53
Seeds 75 (67–84) 75 (67–84) 77 (70–84) 0.63
Activity [U] 0.56 (0.56–0.56) 0.56 (0.56–0.56) 0.56 (0.56–0.56) 0.15
Prostate Volume [cc] 34.3 (28.2–41.1) 34.2 (27.8–41.2) 35.1 (30.0–40.7) 0.73
Prostate V100 [%] 98.6 (97.8–99.8) 98.6 (97.8–99.3) 98.7 (97.8–99.5) 0.34
Prostate V150 [%] 77.8 (75.6–79.8) 77.9 (75.7–79.8) 77.1 (75.1–79.2) 0.09
Prostate V200 [%] 44.4 (40.8–47.5) 44.4 (40.8–47.6) 44.3 (40.6–46.8) 0.30
Prostate D90 [Gy] 189.8 (184.7–193.5) 189.8 (184.7–193.5) 189.4 (183.6–193.8) 0.70
Urethra V140 [cc] 16.1 (10.5–20.0) 16.1 (10.6–20.0) 16.0 (10.7–19.9) 0.95
Urethra V150 [cc] 0.15 (0.00–0.68) 0.15 (0.00–0.63) 0.23 (0.00–0.72) 0.72

∗Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon was used between groups with and without DIL.