Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 4;11:903. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00903

TABLE 6-2.

Summary of hierarchical multiple regressions that tested the predictive power of visual crowding effects for reading fluency.

Step Predictors Reading fluency (ΔR2)
Controlling for variation in age, non-verbal IQ, RAN, PA, and Writing
1 Age 0.120**
2 Non-verbal IQ 0.231***
3 RAN-D 0.150***
4 RAN-O 0.000
5 RAN-C 0.006
6 PA 0.007
7 Writing 0.030*
8 VCSC 0.045**
Controlling for variation in age, non-verbal IQ, VCSC, RAN, and PA
1 Age 0.120**
2 Non-verbal IQ 0.231***
3 VCSC 0.044*
4 RAN-D 0.146***
5 RAN-O 0.000
6 RAN-C 0.010
7 PA 0.003
8 Writing 0.034*
Controlling for variation in age, non-verbal IQ, VCSC, Writing, and PA
1 Age 0.120**
2 Non-verbal IQ 0.231***
3 VCSC 0.044*
4 Writing 0.091***
5 PA 0.011
6 RAN-D 0.075***
6 RAN-O 0.010
6 RAN-C 0.038*

The number on the left indicates the predicators’ order of entering the equation. Asterisk(s) indicates significance levels: *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 and ***p < 0.001.