Skip to main content
. 2020 May 23;25(4):637–642. doi: 10.1016/j.rpor.2020.04.021

Table 5.

Review of literature for prostective studies for SBRT for liver metastases.

Author (year) Design Patients Primary Dose/fractionation Platform Toxicity (cases) Local control OS
Herfarth (2001)22 Phase I-II 35 NR 14−26 Gy/ 1 Linac No serious toxicity 1-year LC 71% 1-year OS 72%
18-mo LC 67%
Schefter (2005)31 Phase I 18 Mixed 36−60 Gy/ 3 Linac No patients experience NR NR
dose-limiting toxicity
Hoyer (2006)32 Phase II 64 (44) CRC 45 Gy/ 3 Linac 1 liver failure 1-year LC 95% 1-year OS 67%
2 severe late GI 2-years LC 79% 2-years OS 38%
Mendez Romero (2006)33 Phase I-II 25 (17) Mixed 30−37.5 Gy/ 3 Linac Grade 3 liver toxicity (2) 2-years LC 86% 2-years OS 62%
Lee (2009)34 Phase I-II 68 Mixed 27.7−60 Gy/ 6 Linac 10% acute Grade 3−4 1-year LC 71% Median 17.6 months
Rusthoven (2009)35 Phase I-II 47 Mixed 36−60 Gy/ 3 Linac <2% Grade 3−4 late toxicity 1-year LC 95% Median 20.5 months
2-years LC 92%
Ambrosino (2009)36 Prospective 27 Mixed 25−60 Gy /3 CK No serious toxicity Crude LC 74% NR
Goodman (2010)37 Phase I 26 (19) Mixed 18−30 Gy / 1 Linac/CK Grade 2 late toxicity (4) 1-year LF 23% 1-year OS 61.8%
2-years OS 49%
Scorsetti (2013)38 Phase II 61 Mixed 75 Gy / 3 Linac Grade 3 late toxicity (1) 1-year LC 94% 1-year OS 84%

NR: not reported; LC: local control; OS: overall survival; CRC: colorectal carcinoma; CK: Cyberknife System.