Table A9.
Random Effects | Groups | Name | Variance | Std.Dev. | ||
item | (Intercept) | 0.14 | 0.38 | |||
participant | Control-Duration | 0.98 | 0.99 | |||
participant.1 | Duration-Intensity | 0.06 | 0.25 | |||
participant.2 | (Intercept) | 0.01 | 0.05 | |||
Fixed Effects | β | SE | z | p | Sign. | Corr. p |
(Intercept) | 0.38 | 0.07 | 5.39 | <0.001 | *** | <0.001 |
Duration-Intensity | −1.14 | 0.2 | −5.71 | <0.001 | *** | <0.001 |
Control-Duration | 0.85 | 0.15 | 5.76 | <0.001 | *** | <0.001 |
Intensity*Group | 0.62 | 0.28 | 2.19 | 0.02 | * | 0.1 |
Duration*Group | −0.06 | 0.19 | −0.32 | 0.74 | ||
Control*Group | 0.04 | 0.29 | 0.17 | 0.87 | ||
Intensity*Musical rhythm perception ability | 0.12 | 0.14 | 0.88 | 0.38 | ||
Duration*Musical rhythm perception ability | −0.32 | 0.09 | −3.44 | <0.001 | *** | 0.003 |
Control*Musical rhythm perception ability | 0.53 | 0.15 | 3.65 | <0.001 | *** | 0.001 |
Intensity*Musical experience | −0.03 | 0.13 | 0.23 | 0.81 | ||
Duration*Musical experience | 0.2 | 0.09 | 2.38 | 0.02 | * | 0.09 |
Control*Musical experience | 0.09 | 0.13 | 0.73 | 0.46 | ||
Intensity*Group*Rhythm perception ability | −0.13 | 0.28 | −0.46 | 0.64 | ||
Duration*Group*Rhythm perception ability | −0.46 | 0.19 | −2.49 | 0.01 | * | 0.06 |
Control*Group*Rhythm perception ability | 0.19 | 0.29 | 0.69 | 0.49 | ||
Intensity*Group*Musical experience | 0.14 | 0.25 | 0.56 | 0.58 | ||
Duration*Group*Musical experience | −0.07 | 0.17 | −0.43 | 0.66 | ||
Control*Group*Musical experience | 0.33 | 0.26 | 1.26 | 0.21 1 |
1 Formula: Response ~ Condition/(Group * Muscial rhythm perception ability + Musical experience) + (1 + Duration-Intensity + Control-Duration || participant) + (1 | item). Level of significance: * p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001.Table A9 reports the results of Model 5, which extended Model 3 by adding musical experience as control variable (Formula: Response ~ Condition/(Group*Musical rhythm perception ability + Musical experience) + (1 + Duration-Intensity + Control-Duration || participant) + (1 | item). The results of Model 5 match those of Model 3, suggesting the same highly significant effects of musical rhythm perception ability on the duration (p = 0.003) and the control condition (p = 0.001). Altogether, there were no significant effects of musical experience. Model comparisons revealed that Model 5 was not better than Model 3 (χ2 = 8.82, p < 0.18).