Skip to main content
. 2020 May 25;25(10):2461. doi: 10.3390/molecules25102461

Table 1.

Binding affinity of the studied compounds.

Compound IC50 ± S.E.M. [nM] 1
No. μOR 2
1 TAPP 5.1 ± 3.5
Backbone Expansion without Changing the Spatial Positioning of the Side-Chain
8 [(R)-β2hTyr1]-TAPP* 77.6 ± 2.4
9 [(R)-β2h-m-Tyr1]-TAPP* 48.9 ± 2.3
10 [(S)-β2hAla2]-TAPP > 1000
11 [(R)-β2hPhe3]-TAPP 95.4 ± 2.5
12 [(R)-β2hPhe4]-TAPP 1.9 ± 2.4
Backbone Expansion with Changing the Spatial Positioning of the Side-Chain
13 [(S)-β2hTyr1]-TAPP * 338.8 ± 5.1
14 [(S)-β2h-m-Tyr1]-TAPP* 11.2 ± 6.3
15 [(R)-β2hAla2]-TAPP 954.9 ± 2.9
16 [(S)-β2hPhe3]-TAPP 15.5 ± 2.5
17 [(S)-β2hPhe4]-TAPP 7.8 ± 4.0

1 IC50 ± S.E.M. Half-maximal inhibitory concentration ± standard error of the mean. Mean of three determinations in duplicate. 2 Radioligand: 0.5 nM [3H]DAMGO.