Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 2;2020:1015280. doi: 10.1155/2020/1015280

Table 2.

Factors associated with anaemia in the study participants at baseline.

Factor Odds ratio 95% CI p value
Parental education status
 At least secondary education Reference [1]
 Basic education 2.37 0.27–20.52 0.433
 No education 1.57 0.47–5.28 0.468

Parental occupation
 Formal employment Reference [1]
 Informal employment 1.027 0.360–2.932 0.960

Parental marital status
 Single Reference [1]
 Married 2.50 0.16–3.02 0.511

Parental monthly income
 Monthly income (≥1000 cedis) Reference [1]
 Monthly income (500–999  cedis) 1.79 0.019–2.40 0.210
 Monthly income (1–499 cedis) 1.95 0.221–0.86 0.039

Participant's nutritional status
 Normal retinol level (≥20 μg/dl) Reference [1]
 Low retinol level (<20 μg/dl) 1.68 0.10–0.99 0.049
 Normal (HAZ > −2 standard deviations Reference [1]
 Stunted (HAZ ≤ −2 standard deviations 1.59 0.13–2.64 0.491

Participant's infection status
 Malaria parasitaemia absent Reference [1]
 Malaria parasitaemia present 1.64 0.27–9.89 0.069

Dietary intake
 Adequate intake (≥DRI) Reference [1]
 Inadequate iron intake (<DRI) 2.32 0.48–3.63 0.052
 Inadequate fat intake (<DRI) 1.03 0.99–1.07 0.127
 Inadequate protein intake (<DRI) 1.23 0.13–8.67 0.431

Gender
 Boys Reference [1]
 Girls 2.58 0.94–7.08 0.920

Age 0.82 0.738

p values are significant at p < 0.05. Binary logistic analysis was performed (Cox & Snell R Square = 0.186; Nagelkerke R Square = 0.248).