Skip to main content
. 2020 May 26;5(22):12789–12808. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.0c00423

Table 6. Comparison of Ultimate Tensile Strength, Strain at Break, and Degree of Crystallinity Values of Compatibilized 40i-PP/60ECR/5C Blend (Documented in This Article) with Some of the PP- and Polar Elastomer-Based TPEs (with Different Compatibilizers) Reported in the Literaturea.

sl. no. TPEs compatibilizing agent ultimate tensile strength (MPa) strain at break (%) degree of crystallinity (XC (%)) by DSC ref
1 50PP/50ACM/5MA-PP/0.5TETA MA-PP (5 wt %) and TETA (0.5 wt %) 15.9 340 38.6 (17)
2 60PP/100m-EPM/10MA-PP MA-PP (10 wt %) 3.5 120   (20)
3 50DPM-PP/50NBR technological compatibilization 10.1 66   (23)
4 40PP/60NBRr/1ER ER (1 phr) 5 6.5   (19)
5 40i-PP/60ECR/5MA-PP MA-PP (5 wt %) 15.5 138 39.8 (21)
6 40i-PP/60ECR/5C E-AE-MA-TP (5 wt %) 17.2 370 42.1 this paper
a

PP represents polypropylene, ACM represents acrylic rubber, MA-PP represents maleic anhydride-grafted polypropylene, TETA represents triethylene tetramine, m-EPM represents maleated ethylene propylene rubber, DPM-PP represents dimethylol phenolic-modified polypropylene, NBRr represents recycled acrylonitrile butadiene rubber, ER represents epoxy resin, ECR represents epichlorohydrin rubber, and E-AE-MA-TP represents the ethylene-acrylic ester-maleic anhydride terpolymer.