Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jun 11.
Published in final edited form as: Ann Thorac Surg. 2018 Sep 26;107(1):143–150. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.07.069

Table 2:

Predictors of death/cardiac transplant >90 days post-1st M-MVR

Adjusted Hazards Ratio 95% CI Significant p-value
Male vs female 1.5 1.0 – 2.3 0.05
Sz/wt >2 vs ≤ 2
 1 year post-M-MVR 1.5 0.5–4.3
 10 years post-M-MVR 0.3 0.1–0.8 0.02
Age <2 years vs. 12 - <21 years
 1 year post-M-MVR 1.8 0.4–7.0
 10 years post-M-MVR 4.3 1.2–15.1 0.02
Age 2 - <6 years vs. 12 - <21 years
 1 year post-M-MVR 1.7 0.6 –4.8
 10 years post-M-MVR 1.7 0.6–4.3
Age 6 - <12 years vs. 12 - <21 years
 1 year post-M-MVR 2.0 0.7–5.3
 10 years post-M-MVR 1.9 0.8–4.8
Concurrent other valve replacement vs. none 1.8 0.9–3.5
Non-bi-leaflet vs. bi-leaflet valve 2.4 1.3 –4.3 <0.01
Pacemaker ≤90 days following M-MVR vs. none
 1 year post-M-MVR 1.7 0.9–3.0
 10 years post-M-MVR 1.1 0.6–2.1

Time of hazard ratio assessment for variables violating the proportional hazards assumption. Age and Sz/Wt were modeled using Heaviside functions; other syndromes and pacemaker implantation were modeled using a continuous term for interaction with the natural log of time.

Adjusted model includes all variables listed in the table and a random effect for M-MVR treatment center. Era of M-MVR, MV regurgitation and/or stenosis, and primary diagnoses evaluated with these covariates had p>0.2 and did not meaningfully contribute to the model.