Skip to main content
. 2020 May 26;5(22):13303–13311. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.0c01348

Table 1. Rice Yield and Yield Components for Different Treatments in 2016–2018a.

year treatment panicles (million ha–1) spikelets (panicles–1) 1000-gain weight (g) yield (kg ha–1) yield change relative to CFF (%)
2016 CK 3.1d 79c 23.2a 5778e  
CFF 3.7c 88b 24.0a 7641d  
CP0 4.3b 101a 23.8a 8171c 6.9
CP1 5.0a 97a 24.0a 9163a 19.9
CP2 4.5b 102a 23.9a 8842ab 15.7
CP3 4.3b 101a 24.0a 8623b 12.9
2017 CK 3.0c 82b 23.2b 6287d  
CFF 3.9b 85b 24.2a 6810c  
CP0 4.3b 101a 23.9ab 8241b 21.0
CP1 4.9a 98a 24.3a 9003a 32.2
CP2 4.4ab 96a 24.7a 8314b 22.1
CP3 4.18b 100a 24.48a 8155b 19.8
2018 CK 3.3d 80c 24.4a 5362d  
CFF 3.8c 95b 24.0a 7133c  
CP0 4.5b 105a 24.5a 8186b 14.8
CP1 4.7a 105a 24.3a 8896a 24.7
CP2 4.5b 101a 24.5a 8381b 17.5
CP3 4.4b 101a 24.2a 8148b 14.2
a

Note: Means followed by the same lowercase letter within each column in the same year were not significantly different (p > 0.05) based on analysis by one-way ANOVAs followed by Duncan multiple range tests.