Skip to main content
. 2020 May 21;4(2):737–749. doi: 10.1093/tas/txaa071

Table 5.

Effects of DDGS withdrawal periods on overall growth performance and carcass characteristics, Exp. 11,2,3

DDGS withdrawal period, day before marketing Probability, P
Item4 28 21 14 0 Linear Quadratic
Growth performance
 ADG, kg 1.07 1.04 1.02 1.02 0.022 0.202
0.014 0.014 0.014 0.014
 ADFI, kg 2.96 2.92 2.90 2.87 0.112 0.729
0.041 0.041 0.043 0.041
 G:F 0.361 0.357 0.354 0.357 0.479 0.248
0.0037 0.0037 0.0039 0.0037
 Final BW, kg 127.1 126.5 125.6 125.8 0.328 0.476
0.941 0.941 0.982 0.941
Carcass characteristics
 HCW, kg 95.3 94.6 94.1 93.7 0.166 0.702
0.81 080 0.83 0.81
 Carcass yield, % 75.8 75.5 75.6 74.7 0.001 0.377
0.18 0.18 0.19 0.18
 Backfat, mm5 14.8 15.2 15.6 15.1 0.430 0.019
0.19 0.19 0.20 0.20
 Loin depth, mm5 63.3 62.4 62.9 62.5 0.106 0.388
0.27 0.27 0.28 0.27
 Lean, %5 54.9 54.6 54.5 54.7 0.214 0.033
0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11

1A total of 985 finishing pigs (initially 99 ± 2.5 kg BW) were used in a 28-d experiment to evaluate the effects of DDGS withdrawal periods.

2Pigs were fed diets containing 30% DDGS until the start of the trial. Diets with DDGS during the trial also contained 30%.

3Pens of pigs were topped according to a typical summer marketing strategy with one top prior to final barn marketing. All pens were topped by removing the 17% heaviest pigs 21 days before final marketing, resulting in a final barn marketing of approximately 83% of starting barn inventor.

4Standard error of the means are reported below the treatment means.

5 HCW was used as a covariate.