Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 11;159(4):1579–1581.e5. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.06.009

Supplementary Table 2.

Characteristics of Participating Endoscopy Units Based on Baseline Total Number of Procedures Performed

Variable Total
Volume of procedures performed in a year
P valuea
(N = 252) Tertile 1 (<24,99) (n = 74) Tertile 2 (2500 to 6999) (n = 93) Tertile 3 (7000 to 150,000) (n = 85)
Continent .001
 Africa, n (%) 23 (9.1) 12 (16.2) 10 (10.8) 1 (1.2)
 Asia, n (%) 138 (54.8) 44 (59.5) 45 (48.4) 49 (57.6)
 Europe, n (%) 35 (13.9) 4 (5.4) 11 (11.8) 20 (23.5)
 North America, n (%) 32 (12.7) 9 (12.2) 12 (12.9) 11 (12.9)
 Oceania, n (%) 5 (2.0) 0 (0.0) 4 (4.3) 1 (1.2)
 South America, n (%) 19 (7.5) 5 (6.8) 11 (11.8) 3 (3.5)
Volume of procedures performed in your center in a year <.001 K
 Mean ± SD 8212.1 ± 1513 1092.0 ± 635.9 4253.2 ± 1233.8 18742.2 ± 22540.5
 Median (IQR) 5000.0 (2000.0–9000.0) 1000.0 (600.0–1500.0) 4000.0 (3000.0–5000.0) 12000.0 (9000.0–20000.0)
 Sum 2,069,447 80,806.0 395,550.0 1,593,091
Volume of procedures performed during COVID <.001 K
 Mean ± SD 1833.7 ± 8166.5 206.3 ± 304.0 665.1 ± 872.1 4529.1 ± 13681.1
 Median (IQR) 500.0 (125.0–1500.0) 102.5 (25.0–240.0) 400.0 (150.0–750.0) 1875.0 (900.0–3600.0)
 Sum 462086.7 15263.1 61850.5 384973.1
Total number of endoscopists in your unit <.001 K
 Mean ± SD 11.0 ± 14.4 8.0 ± 18.2 8.3 ± 7.6 16.5 ± 15.0
 Median (IQR) 7.0 (3.0–13.0) 3.0 (2.0–8.0) 6.0 (4.0–10.0) 12.0 (8.0–20.0)
Total number of endoscopy nurses in your unit <.001 K
 Mean ± SD 11.8 ± 14.8 5.1 ± 6.9 9.4 ± 11.0 20.2 ± 19.0
 Median (IQR) 6.5 (3.0–15.0) 3.0 (2.0–6.0) 6.0 (3.0–11.0) 16.0 (8.0–25.0)
Total number of endoscopy technicians in your unit <.001 K
 Mean ± SD 5.2 ± 7.8 3.3 ± 6.2 3.6 ± 2.9 8.5 ± 11.1
 Median (IQR) 3.0 (1.0–6.0) 2.0 (1.0–3.0) 3.0 (2.0–5.0) 5.0 (3.0–10.0)
Procedures performed in your center since COVID infection in your region compared with baseline, % .048 K
 Mean ± SD 17.1 ± 17.6 17.9 ± 19.7 14.7 ± 16.4 19.0 ± 16.9
 Median (IQR) 10.0 (5.0–20.0) 10.0 (5.0–25.0) 10.0 (5.0–20.0) 15.0 (7.0–25.0)
EGD/EUS/ERCP procedures during COVID-19 compared with baseline, % <.001 K
 Mean ± SD 18.8 ± 20.7 16.2 ± 21.2 16.9 ± 20.2 23.0 ± 20.4
 Median (IQR) 10.0 (5.0–25.0) 10.0 (2.0–20.0) 10.0 (3.0–20.0) 19.0 (10.0–30.0)
Colonoscopy/sigmoidoscopy procedures performed during COVID compared to baseline .033 K
 Mean ± SD 15.2 ± 18.9 15.8 ± 20.6 12.8 ± 17.2 17.3 ± 19.2
 Median (IQR) 10.0 (3.0–20.0) 8.5 (2.0–20.0) 5.0 (2.0–15.0) 10.0 (5.0–20.0)
PPE for colonoscopy/sigmoidoscopy
 Face mask/surgical mask, n (%) 182 (72.2) 50 (67.6) 72 (77.4) 60 (70.6) .338
 PAPR, n (%) 36 (14.3) 10 (13.5) 14 (15.1) 12 (14.1) .959
 N95, n (%) 167 (66.3) 49 (66.2) 61 (65.6) 57 (67.1) .978
 None, n (%) 5 (2.0) 3 (4.1) 2 (2.2) 0 (0.0) .231
 Gloves, n (%) 242 (96.0) 70 (94.6) 90 (96.8) 82 (96.5) .782
 Gown, n (%) 230 (91.3) 66 (89.2) 83 (89.2) 81 (95.3) .271
 Goggles, n (%) 194 (77.0) 51 (68.9) 77 (82.8) 66 (77.6) .104
How often used?, % .832 K
 Mean ± SD 92.9 ± 20.7 89.3 ± 27.9 93.5 ± 19.4 95.4 ± 13.2
 Median (IQR) 100.0 (100.0–100.0) 100.0 (99.0–100.0) 100.0 (100.0–100.0) 100.0 (100.0–100.0)
 Missing 79 23 28 28
PPE for upper endoscopy (EGD/EUS/ERCP)
 Face mask/surgical mask, n (%) 166 (65.9) 46 (62.2) 66 (71.0) 54 (63.5) .420
 PAPR, n (%) 39 (15.5) 12 (16.2) 15 (16.1) 12 (14.1) .913
 N95, n (%) 193 (76.6) 57 (77.0) 69 (74.2) 67 (78.8) .762
 None, n (%) 7 (2.8) 4 (5.4) 2 (2.2) 1 (1.2) .300
 Gloves, n (%) 242 (96.0) 70 (94.6) 90 (96.8) 82 (96.5) .782
 Gown, n (%) 232 (92.1) 67 (90.5) 85 (91.4) 80 (94.1) .676
 Goggles, n (%) 211 (83.7) 61 (82.4) 81 (87.1) 69 (81.2) .529
How often used?, % .880 K
 Mean ± SD 94.8 ± 17.9 92.0 ± 26.1 95.7 ± 14.6 96.4 ± 11.4
 Median (IQR) 100.0 (100.0–100.0) 100.0 (100.0–100.0) 100.0 (100.0–100.0) 100.0 (100.0–100.0)
 Missing 54 16 20 18
Did any of your endoscopy staff have COVID-19 infection?, n (%) 34 (13.5) 2 (2.7) 9 (9.7) 23 (27.1) <.001
Endoscopy staff with COVID-19 infection who needed hospitalization, % .582 K
 Mean ± SD 7.9 ± 23.8 0.0 ± 0.0 14.4 ± 32.7 6.0 ± 20.7
 Median (IQR) 0.0 (0.0–2.0) 0.0 (0.0–0.0) 0.0 (0.0–15.0) 0.0 (0.0–2.0)
 Missing 218 72 84 62

ECRP, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography; EGD, esophagogastroduodenoscopy; EUS, endoscopic ultrasonography.

a

Continuous variables were compared using 1-way analysis of variance. Categorical variables were compared using χ2 or the Fisher’s exact test, except as noted with the Kruskal-Wallis (K) test.