Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun;6(2):101–110. doi: 10.18383/j.tom.2020.00009

Table 2.

AUCs from Logistic Regression in the First Cohort of 735 Patients Using Percent Change in Mean cBPE as a Predictor for pCR

Patient Cohort N pCR Rate (%) Method %ΔBPE0_1 %ΔBPE0_2
AUC P-Value AUC P-Value
Full Cohort 735 35.1 Full stack 0.53 .09* 0.52 .14
Half stack 0.52 .23 0.52 .18
Center 5 0.51 .30 0.50 .50
HR+/HER2+ 112 33.9 Full stack 0.58 .08* 0.53 .30
Half stack 0.56 .14 0.53 .31
Center 5 0.56 .15 0.52 .39
HR+/HER2− 299 19.1 Full stack 0.53 .23 0.61 .01**
Half stack 0.52 .32 0.60 .01**
Center 5 0.53 .24 0.59 .02**
HR−/HER2+ 61 68.9 Full stack 0.57 .20 0.62 .08*
Half stack 0.59 .14 0.60 .11
Center 5 0.56 .25 0.53 .35
HR−/HER2− 263 46.0 Full stack 0.52 .33 0.50 .49
Half stack 0.51 .42 0.50 .46
Center 5 0.52 .28 0.54 .15

All measurements were obtained from bias corrected images with poor, adequate, and good segmentation quality. *P < .10; **P < .05.