Table 2.
Coefficient of Variation Resultsa
| DRO | Approximate Volume | Surface Area | 2D Diameter | 3D Diameter | Sphericity | Mean Intensity | Standard Deviation | Kurtosisb | GLCM Entropy |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Uniform Phantom | 0.004% | 13.41% | 0.23% | 0.27% | 12.82% | 0.00% | — | — | 1002% |
| Intensity Varying Phantom | 0.004% | 13.41% | 0.23% | 0.27% | 12.82% | 0.00% | 0.11% | 0.31% | 50.9% |
| Shape Varying Phantom | 0.010% | 12.27% | 0.71% | 0.18% | 11.70% | 0.00% | — | — | 625% |
aCV results are expressed as a percentage for each feature and each DRO across all 13 submissions. Note that there was no value for standard deviation and kurtosis for the uniform phantom and shape varying phantom, as the intensity values for these phantoms were all set to the same value (100 HU).
bw/Fisher correction.