Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun;6(2):118–128. doi: 10.18383/j.tom.2019.00031

Table 2.

Coefficient of Variation Resultsa

DRO Approximate Volume Surface Area 2D Diameter 3D Diameter Sphericity Mean Intensity Standard Deviation Kurtosisb GLCM Entropy
Uniform Phantom 0.004% 13.41% 0.23% 0.27% 12.82% 0.00% 1002%
Intensity Varying Phantom 0.004% 13.41% 0.23% 0.27% 12.82% 0.00% 0.11% 0.31% 50.9%
Shape Varying Phantom 0.010% 12.27% 0.71% 0.18% 11.70% 0.00% 625%

aCV results are expressed as a percentage for each feature and each DRO across all 13 submissions. Note that there was no value for standard deviation and kurtosis for the uniform phantom and shape varying phantom, as the intensity values for these phantoms were all set to the same value (100 HU).

bw/Fisher correction.