TABLE 3.
Subsequent food intake after the BEEF and SOY lunch meals within the protein comparison and serving size comparison conditions in 21 healthy adults1
Protein comparison (macronutrient and fiber matched) | Serving size comparison (serving size matched to 1 serving) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BEEF | SOY | P 2 | BEEF | SOY | P 2 | |
Ad libitum dinner buffet | ||||||
Energy content, kcal | 920 ± 74 | 970 ± 82 | 0.59 | 920 ± 75 | 900 ± 72 | 0.70 |
Protein, g | 38 ± 5 | 39 ± 5 | 0.65 | 36 ± 4 | 36 ± 5 | 0.97 |
Carbohydrates, g | 110 ± 9 | 110 ± 12 | 0.78 | 120 ± 12 | 110 ± 9 | 0.28 |
Fat, g | 40 ± 5 | 43 ± 5 | 0.43 | 39 ± 4 | 40 ± 4 | 0.64 |
Evening snacks | ||||||
Energy content, kcal | 340 ± 74 | 380 ± 90 | 0.58 | 640 ± 130 | 420 ± 120 | 0.24 |
Protein, g | 14 ± 5 | 13 ± 3 | 0.82 | 24 ± 4 | 12 ± 6 | 0.11 |
Carbohydrates, g | 43 ± 8 | 46 ± 10 | 0.72 | 83 ± 16 | 48 ± 12 | 0.11 |
Fat, g | 13 ± 4 | 12 ± 4 | 0.78 | 21 ± 6 | 14 ± 5 | 0.33 |
Values are means ± SEMs,n = 21.
Repeated measures ANOVA: main effect of protein source (BEEF vs. SOY) within protein or serving size comparison.