Skip to main content
. 2013 Oct 1;89(4):86, 1-10. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.113.111971

Table. 2.

Selected results of DAVID functional annotation clustering for differentially expressed genes in the GE of the PD 10 and DOPP 2.5 and 3.5 mouse uteri.

Representative functional terms of overrepresented annotation clustersa Enrichment scoreb
PD 10
 Morphogenesis of a branching structure (10, 9.8) 6.0
 Lung development (6, 6.6); respiratory tube development (6, 6.5) 3.2
 EGF-like calcium-binding (6, 8.9) 3.1
 Isoprenoid metabolic process (6, 15.3); retinoid metabolic process (5, 21.8) 2.7
 Concanavalin A-like lectin/glucanase, subgroup (5, 8.9) 2.4
 Glycosaminoglycan binding (6, 6.3); carbohydrate binding (7, 2.6) 2.2
 Mesenchymal cell differentiation (4, 9.9) 1.9
 Branching involved in ureteric bud morphogenesis (3, 13.0) 1.6
 Cell migration 1.2
DOPP 2.5
 Cell cycle (26, 2.5) 5.1
 Condensed chromosome (7, 3.5) 2.5
 Retinoic acid metabolic process (4, 14.1); cellular hormone metabolic process (4, 4.7) 2.0
 Collagen (4, 11.4) 1.9
 Alcohol dehydrogenase (3, 18.8) 1.8
 Sulfatase (3, 13.9) 1.6
 NAD(P)-binding domain (6, 2.3) 1.5
 Tight junction (5, 4.9) 1.4
 EGF-like 4; calcium-binding (5, 8.9) 1.1
DOPP 3.5
 Proteinaceous extracellular matrix (49, 3.4) 13.9
 EGF-like calcium-binding, conserved site (18, 4.6) 6.0
 Polysaccharide binding (20, 3.5) 5.2
 Egf-like domain (26, 2.7) 4.7
 Proteinase inhibitor I1, Kazal (11, 5.6) 4.5
 Regulation of locomotion (14, 3.0) 2.9
 Transmembrane (243, 1.11) 2.6
 Regulation of kinase activity (18, 2.2); regulation of phosphorylation (23, 1.9) 2.4
a

Values within parenthess indicate the number of genes and fold enrichment of the functional term.

b

Geometric mean of member'sP values of the corresponding annotation cluster (in −log10 scale).