Table 2. Adjusted risk ratios for pre-TAS failure from log-binomial model sensitivity analysis.
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Full Model | Without Cameroon districts | Only districts in Africa | Only W. bancrofti parasite districts | Only Anopheles vector districts | |
| Number of Failures | 74 | 74 | 44 | 72 | 46 |
| Number of total districts | (N = 554) | (N = 420) | (N = 407) | (N = 518) | (N = 414) |
| Covariate | RR (95% CI) | RR (95% CI) | RR (95% CI) | RR (95% CI) | RR (95% CI) |
| Baseline prevalence > = 10% & used FTS test | 2.38 (0.96–5.90) | 1.23 (0.52–2.92) | 14.52 (1.79–117.82) | 2.61 (1.03–6.61) | 15.80 (1.95–127.67) |
| Baseline prevalence > = 10% & used ICT test | 0.80 (0.20–3.24) | 0.42 (0.11–1.68) | 1.00 (0.00–0.00) | 0.88 (0.21–3.60) | 1.00 (0.00–0.00) |
| +Used FTS test | 1.16 (0.52–2.59) | 2.40 (1.12–5.11) | 0.15 (0.02–1.11) | 1.03 (0.45–2.36) | 0.13 (0.02–0.96) |
| +Used ICT test | 0.92 (0.32–2.67) | 1.47 (0.51–4.21) | 0.33 (0.04–2.54) | 0.82 (0.28–2.43) | 0.27 (0.03–2.04) |
| +Baseline prevalence > = 10% | 2.52 (1.37–4.64) | 2.42 (1.31–4.47) | 2.03 (1.06–3.90) | 2.30 (1.21–4.36) | 2.01 (1.07–3.77) |
| Elevation < 350m | 3.07 (1.95–4.83) | 2.21 (1.42–3.43) | 4.68 (2.22–9.87) | 3.04 (1.93–4.79) | 3.76 (1.92–7.37) |
NOTE: Table shows adjusted Risk Ratio (RR) of failing pre-TAS.
Gray shading & + denote interaction terms, Bold text denotes statistically significant results with p-values ≤0.05