Table 6.
Summary of outcomes of enterovesical fistulae managed by laparoscopic resection
Ref. | Sample size | Enterovesical fistula (n) | Conversion to open (n) | Conversion rate (%) | Reason for conversion | Morbidity (%) |
Kockerling et al[81] | 304 | 6 | 1 | 16.6 | Not stated | 20 |
Franklin et al[82] | 164 | 6 | 0 | 0 | Not stated | |
Engledow et al[84] | 31 | 31 | 9 | 29 | 6: Early conversion, 1: Poor visualisation; 1: Bleeding; 1: Inflammatory mass | 13 |
Pokala et al[88] | 43 | 13; Ileovesical: 4; colovesical: 9 | All fistulae: 14; EVF: 2 | All fistulae: 32.5; EVF: 15.4 | Dense adhesions | All fistulae: 30; EVF: 15 |
Smeenk et al[90] | 40 | 35 | 48 | |||
Marney et al[89] | 15 | 15 | 5 | 33 | 3: Dense adhesions; 1: Inflammatory mass | 20 |
1: Friable tissue secondary to radiotherapy |
EVF: Enterovesical fistulae.