Skip to main content
letter
. 2020 Mar 24;135(24):2192–2195. doi: 10.1182/blood.2019003722

Table 1.

Clinical characteristics and outcomes of CLL patients with venetoclax resistance after BTK-inhibitor treatment

Pt no. Sex No. of prior therapies IgVH status Complex karyotype* MYC Tris12 del13q ATM p53 Age at venetoclax initiation, y Months on venetoclax Progression type Survival after progression, mo
1 M 4 Unmutated Yes Yes Yes Yes 74 25 CLL type NA
2 M 13 Unmutated No Yes 53 22 CLL type NA
3 M 2 Unmutated Yes Yes Yes 66 24 CLL type NA
4 M 7 Unmutated Yes Yes Yes 69 24 CLL type NA
5 M 5 Unmutated Yes 57 13 CLL type 6
6 M 6 Unmutated Yes Yes 79 22 CLL type 10
7 M 5 Unmutated Yes Yes Yes Yes 59 2 CLL type NA
8 M 8 Unmutated Yes Yes 72 33 CLL type NA
9 F 6 Unmutated Yes Yes Yes 59 19 Richter 2
10 M 6 Unmutated Yes Yes 55 6 Richter 2
11 F 8 Mutated Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 65 4 Richter 17

ATM, ataxia telangectasia mutation; F, female; IgVH, mutation status of the immunoglobulin heavy chain variable region; M, male; NA, not applicable; Pt no., patient number.

*

Defined as ≥3 abnormalities on CpG oligonucleotide-stimulated karyotype.

Patient also received acalabrutinib prior to venetoclax.