Skip to main content
. 2020 May;8(10):622. doi: 10.21037/atm-20-3311

Table 1. Meta-analyses of secondary outcomes.

Secondary outcomes Number of included studies Meta-analyses Quality of evidence
ES (95% CI) I2 (%)
Number of lobes affected
   1 31 0.13 (0.09–0.18) 84.23 Low
   2 16 0.14 (0.09–0.19) 82.10 Low
   3 17 0.11 (0.09–0.14) 59.42 Low
   4 14 0.15 (0.09–0.21) 87.71 Low
   5 18 0.42 (0.29–0.56) 96.22 Low
Location of lobe involvement
   Right upper lobe 21 0.62 (0.56–0.69) 64.55 Low
   Right middle lobe 21 0.51 (0.43–0.59) 78.15 Low
   Right lower lobe 28 0.84 (0.78–0.90) 70.66 Low
   Left upper lobe 23 0.69 (0.61–0.76) 75.81 Low
   Left lower lobe 26 0.81 (0.74–0.87) 72.75 Low
Distribution of lesion
   Peripheral 36 0.65 (0.55–0.74)) 94.02 Low
   Central 13 0.03 (0.02–0.05) 52.09 Low
   Mixed 22 0.45 (0.37–0.53) 87.06 Low
Others
   Rounded morphology 7 0.42 (0.27–0.58) 76.26 Low
   Linear opacities 18 0.27 (0.16–0.38) 90.01 Low
   Crazy-paving pattern 27 0.29 (0.21–0.39) 90.57 Low
   Air bronchogram 40 0.42 (0.33–0.50) 93.78 Low
   Interlobular septum thickening 22 0.44 (0.33–0.57) 91.19 Low
   Pleural thickening 16 0.30 (0.12–0.51) 95.88 Low
   Halo sign 12 0.22 (0.09–0.39) 90.80 Low
   Reverse halo sign 8 0.02 (0.01–0.04) 0.00 Moderate
   Pleural effusion 67 0.01 (0.00–0.02) 56.97 Low
   Lymphadenopathy 49 0.00 (0.00–0.01) 68.31 Low

ES, estimated size; CI, confidence interval.