Skip to main content
. 2020 May 6;9(5):1356. doi: 10.3390/jcm9051356

Table 3.

Comparison of clinical features, pulmonary function tests (PFTs) according to the anti-tRNA autoantibodies.

Variable Anti-Jo1+ Patients
n = 10
Anti-PL7+ Patients
n = 8
Anti-PL12+ Patients
n = 11
Anti-EJ+ Patients
v10
p-Value
Age at baseline assessment 45 ± 9.5 62 ± 10.7 51.5 ± 5.6 50.9 ± 7.4 0.002
Female gender * 9 (90%) 7 (87.5%) 4 (45.5%) 9 (90%) 0.13
Pulmonary symptoms before baseline evaluation 7.5 (2–14) 15 (5–24) 12 (1–20) 12 (6–12) 0.87
Patients with ILD progression at follow-up. 0 1 (12.5%) 2 (18.18%) 0 0.27
Arthritis * 10 (100%) 5 (62%) 8 (73%) 5 (50%) 0.06
Mechanic’s hand sign * 8 (80%) 5 (62.5%) 7 (63.6%) 3 (30%) 0.16
Fever * 7 (70%) 3 (37.5%) 4 (36.4%) 6 (60%) 0.37
Raynaud’s phenomenon * 6 (60%) 3 (37.5%) 2 (19%) 2 (20%) 0.18
CK level at baseline *** 516 (107–2413) 61 (34–75.5) 100 (50–178) 240 (88–1652) 0.004
Anti-Ro52 positivity * 5 (50%) 5 (62.5%) 8 (72.7%) 8 (80%) 0.55
Baseline % of predicted value of FVC ** 65 (34–76) 75 (59–86.5) 45 (42–64) 44 (40–60) 0.20
Baseline % of predictive value of DLCO 51 (38–80) 48 (29.5–61.5) 40 (33–55) 45.5 (32–73) 0.85
Patients with improvement in FVC (>10%) or in DLCO (>15%) * 6 (60%) 4(50%) 6 (54.5%) 10 (100%) 0.047
Patients with lung disease progression in FVC (>10%) or in DLCO (15%) * 0 1 (12.5%) 2 (19%) 0 0.27
Follow-up % of predicted value of FVC 74 (57–104) 66 (49–95.5) 58.5 (43–62) 71 (43–92) 0.35
Follow-up % of predicted value of DLCO 80 (55–119) 70 (37–89) 56 (40–57) 61 (35–87) 0.37

* Categorical variables are described with percentages. ** Medians (IQR). Anti-PL7+ patients are different from anti-Jo1+ and anti-Ej+ patients at baseline age evaluation, p < 0.001 and < 0.049, respectively, anti-PL7 tended be older compared to anti-PL12+ patients (p < 0.064). *** Anti-PL7 had statistically lower CK levels compared to Anti-Jo1+ (p < 0.0034), and anti-Ej (p < 0.009). Anti-PL12+ patients had lower baseline CK levels compared to anti-Jo1+ patients (p < 0.03).