Skip to main content
. 2020 May 12;11(5):543. doi: 10.3390/genes11050543

Table 2.

Prioritization result for top hub-genes, harboring functional candidate variants, from differentially co-expressed modules between high-fertile (HF) and sub-fertile (SF) animals.

Gene ID Mapped Candidate Modules Top Hub-Gene Candidate Modules Overall Adjusted p-Value (FDR 5%)
ENSBTAG00000046047 Cyan HF Cyan HF NA *
PWP2 Cyan HF, Lightgreen SF Cyan HF, Lightgreen SF 0.112
DACT2 Darkgreen HF Darkgreen HF 0.028 **
MIA3 Green HF Green HF 0.032 **
COLGALT2 Green HF Green HF 0.109
SKA2 Grey60 HF Grey60 HF 0.05
MAPKAP1 Grey60 HF Grey60 HF 0.018 **
PPP1R12B Lightgreen HF Lightgreen HF 0.026 **
SLC25A15 Lightgreen HF Lightgreen HF 0.09
EEF1AKMT1 Lightgreen HF Lightgreen HF 0.1
PARP4 Lightgreen HF Lightgreen HF 0.052
FMO2 Purple HF Purple HF 0.061
MDM4 Red HF Red HF 0.018 **
RABIF Red HF Red HF 0.109
CCDC181 Saddlebrown HF Saddlebrown HF 0.085
F2RL2 Saddlebrown HF Saddlebrown HF 0.028 **
IQCG Tan HF Tan HF 0.022 **
HACL1 Tan HF Tan HF 0.09
PIGR Turquoise HF Turquoise HF 0.026 **
ARHGEF16 Turquoise HF Turquoise HF 0.028 **
NRDE2 Lightgreen SF Lightgreen SF 0.278
IFT80 Turquoise HF, Paleturquoise SF Paleturquoise SF 0.028 **

* NA = not applicable as it was not possible to obtain a gene symbol for this transcript; ** significant prioritization at a significance level of 0.05 after false discovery rate (FDR) correction.