Skip to main content
. 2020 May 24;9(5):1593. doi: 10.3390/jcm9051593

Table 1.

Diagnostic performance of deep-learning models for binary classification of colorectal lesions on colonoscopic photographs in the test dataset.

Model Diagnostic Performance,% (95% CI) AUC (95% CI)
Accuracy (%) Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%) PPV (%) NPV (%)
Neoplastic lesions vs. non-neoplastic lesions
ResNet-152 79.4 (78.5–80.3) 95.4 (93.2–97.6) 30.1 (25.5–34.7) 80.8 (78.4–83.2) 68.8 (58.4–79.2) 0.821 (0.802–0.840)
Inception-ResNet-v2 79.5 (77.6–81.4) 94.1 (92.5–95.7) 34.1 (28.1–40.1) 81.6 (80.6–82.6) 65.0 (54.7–75.3) 0.832 (0.810–0.854)
Advanced colorectal lesions vs. non-advanced colorectal lesions
ResNet-152 86.7 (84.9–88.5) 80.0 (75.4–84.6) 91.3 (90.8–91.8) 86.0 (83.7–88.3) 87.1 (85.1–89.1) 0.929 (0.927–0.931)
Inception-ResNet-v2 87.1 (86.2–88.0) 83.2 (81.5–84.9) 89.7 (87.7–91.7) 84.5 (81.0–88.0) 88.7 (87.7–89.7) 0.935 (0.929–0.941)

CI, confidence interval; PPV, positive predictive value; NPV, negative predictive value; AUC, area under the curve.