Table 3.
b | SE | p | |
---|---|---|---|
Participant characteristics | |||
Age | .01 | .00 | .010 |
White | −.25 | .07 | <.001 |
Hispanic | .16 | .09 | .085 |
Female | .35 | .06 | <.001 |
Gay, lesbian, or bisexual | −.19 | .10 | .049 |
Bachelor’s degree or higher | .03 | .06 | .631 |
OTP user | .17 | .06 | .008 |
Type of tobacco user | |||
Only cigarettes | REF | REF | |
Only e-cigarettes | −.75 | .08 | <.001 |
Dual user | −.39 | .06 | <.001 |
Message characteristics | |||
Health harm category | |||
Addiction | REF | REF | |
Other health effects | .46 | .04 | <.001 |
Device explosions | .62 | .08 | <.001 |
E-liquid toxicity | .65 | .08 | <.001 |
Chemicals set 2 | .78 | .08 | <.001 |
Chemicals set 1 | .81 | .08 | <.001 |
Cardiovascular harm | .93 | .08 | <.001 |
Respiratory harm | .99 | .08 | <.001 |
The table shows unstandardized regression coefficients (b) and standard errors (SE); outcome was discouragement from smoking (1 = not at all, to 5 = a lot).