Skip to main content
. 2019 Oct 29;2019:baz085. doi: 10.1093/database/baz085

Table 7.

Performance results of the three largest single-annotator sets for the PMRA, BM25 and TF-IDF methods. Metrics include MCC, AUC (ROC), MRR and P@N, given as (mean ± stdev).

# MCC AUC MRR P@5 P@10 P@20
A1 BM25 92 0.610 ± 0.25 0.771 ± 0.19 0.740 ± 0.34 0.335 ± 0.19 0.226 ± 0.13 0.150 ± 0.09
PMRA 0.580 ± 0.26 0.728 ± 0.23 0.726 ± 0.35 0.313 ± 0.19 0.212 ± 0.11 0.149 ± 0.08
TFIDF 0.601 ± 0.27 0.752 ± 0.21 0.735 ± 0.35 0.337 ± 0.23 0.220 ± 0.13 0.155 ± 0.09
A2 BM25 55 0.538 ± 0.23 0.710 ± 0.19 0.882 ± 0.24 0.611 ± 0.29 0.498 ± 0.29 0.408 ± 0.27
PMRA 0.547 ± 0.17 0.699 ± 0.15 0.892 ± 0.24 0.553 ± 0.28 0.420 ± 0.24 0.342 ± 0.22
TFIDF 0.564 ± 0.20 0.729 ± 0.15 0.900 ± 0.25 0.615 ± 0.30 0.480 ± 0.28 0.377 ± 0.26
A3 BM25 49 0.550 ± 0.25 0.733 ± 0.18 0.966 ± 0.14 0.780 ± 0.22 0.698 ± 0.26 0.627 ± 0.28
PMRA 0.561 ± 0.25 0.732 ± 0.19 0.944 ± 0.17 0.788 ± 0.24 0.718 ± 0.24 0.614 ± 0.28
TFIDF 0.504 ± 0.25 0.697 ± 0.20 0.922 ± 0.20 0.710 ± 0.26 0.659 ± 0.29 0.605 ± 0.31

The bold values indicate maximal metric value between the three baseline methods.