Table 2. Statistical comparisons of lesion treatment effectiveness.

Number of effective and ineffective lesion treatments for each species and treatment type and p-values from Fisher’s exact test comparisons between treatments for each species. Statistically significant results are highlighted in green.

	Control	New Base Placebo	New Base + Amoxi	Base 2b Placebo	Base 2b + Amoxi
CNAT
Effective: ineffective	0:8 (0%)	0:2 (0%)	2:5 (29%)	3:5 (38%)	2:1 (67%)
Control	–	N/A (both zero)	0.2	0.2	0.055
New Base Placebo	N/A (both zero)	–	1	1	0.4
New Base + Amoxi	0.2	1	–	1	0.5
Base 2b Placebo	0.2	1	1	–	0.54
Base 2b + Amoxi	0.055	0.4	0.5	0.54	–
OFAV
Effective: ineffective	0:4 (0%)	1:18 (5%)	10:2 (83%)	0:14 (0%)	21:2 (91%)
Control	–	1	0.008	N/A (both zero)	<0.001
New Base Placebo	1	–	<0.001	1	<0.001
New Base + Amoxi	0.008	<0.001	–	<0.001	0.594
Base 2b Placebo	N/A (both zero)	1	<0.001	–	<0.001
Base 2b + Amoxi	<0.001	<0.001	0.594	<0.001	–
MCAV
Effective: ineffective	0:4 (0%)	0:6 (0%)	4:0 (100%)	0:9 (0%)	8:1 (89%)
Control	–	N/A (both zero)	0.029	N/A (both zero)	0.007
New Base Placebo	N/A (both zero)	–	0.005	N/A (both zero)	0.001
New Base + Amoxi	0.029	0.005	–	0.001	1
Base 2b Placebo	N/A (both zero)	N/A (both zero)	0.001	–	<0.001
Base 2b + Amoxi	0.007	0.001	1	<0.001	–
DLAB
Effective: ineffective	–	–	–	1:7 (13%)	7:1 (88%)
Base 2b Placebo	–	–	–	–	0.001
PSTR
Effective: ineffective	–	–	–	0:8 (0%)	11:4 (73%)
Base 2b Placebo	–	–	–	–	0.001