Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 11;20(2):12. doi: 10.5334/ijic.4718

Table 4.

Two-step cluster analyses of structures, processes and outcomes in three mental health (MH) service networks. Summary of the main results.

Structures
Manager characteristics
Category 1
(n = 10; 22.2%)
“Metropolitan network: primary care teams”
Category 2
(n = 9; 20.0%)
“Metropolitan network: specialized MH teams”
Category 3
(n = 19; 42.2%)
“Urban network: all teams”
Category 4
(n = 7; 15.6%)
“Semi-urban network: allC teams”

Settings Metropolitan MH service network Metropolitan MH service network Urban MH service network Semi-urban MH service network c
Government financial support for MH per inhabitant Highly positive Highly positive Positive Highly negative
Proportion of population with low income Highly negative Highly negative Highly positive Positive
High emergency room (ER) users Positive Highly negative Positive Highly positive
Frequency in use of clinical approaches Highly negative Positive Positive Highly positive
Frequency in use of standardized clinical procedures and tools Highly negative Highly positive Positive Negative
Organizational culture (Mean, SD) Clan culture Highly positive Highly negative Negative Positive
Entrepreneurial culture Highly negative Positive Negative Highly positive
Market culture Highly negative Highly positive Positive Negative
Hierarchical culture Highly negative Positive Positive Highly positive
Frequency of interaction with other teams and services (Mean, SD) (rating: 0–5) Highly negative Highly negative Highly positive Highly negative
Frequency in use of integration strategies (Mean, SD) (rating: 0–5) Positive Highly positive Highly negative Negative
Team processes
MH professional characteristics
Category 1
(n = 92; 29.6%)
“Metropolitan network: psychosocial professionals”
Category 2
(n = 112; 36.0%)
Metropolitan and urban networks: senior medical professionals”
Category 3
(n = 69; 22.2%)
“Urban network: psychosocial professionals”
Category 4
(n = 38; 12.2%)
“Semi-urban network: all professionals”

Sites Mostly Metropolitan MH service network Mainly Metropolitan MH service network Exclusively Urban MH service network Exclusively Semi-urban MH service network
Professions Mainly psychosocial professions Mainly medical professions Exclusively psychosocial professions Mainly psychosocial professions
Seniority in profession Medium Oldest Old Youngest
Recovery-Oriented Services Highly negative Highly positive Positive Negative
Team Interdependence Highly negative Highly positive Negative Medium
Team Support Highly negative Highly positive Negative Positive
Team Autonomy Highly negative Positive Medium Highly positive
Involvement in the Decision–Making Process Highly negative Highly positive Negative Highly positive
Work Role Performance Highly negative Highly positive Negative Medium
Conflict Between Co-Workers Highly negative Positive Positive Highly positive
Team Collaboration Highly negative Highly positive Medium Positive
Job Satisfaction Highly negative Highly positive Medium Positive
Outcomes
Service user characteristics
Category 1
(n = 84; 25.7%)
“Metropolitan network: middle-age men with positive outcomes”
Category 2
(n = 66; 20.1%)
“Metropolitan network: older women with few MH problems”
Category 3
(n = 88; 26.9%)
“Metropolitan and other networks: service users with complex MH problems and negative outcomes”
Category 4
(n = 89; 27.2%)
“Urban and semi-urban networks: young service users with drug disorders”

Sites Exclusively Metropolitan MH service network Exclusively Metropolitan MH service network From the three networks Urban and semi-urban MH service networks
Gender Exclusively male Exclusively female Mainly female Mixed
Age categories Mainly 45–54 Mainly 55 and over Mixed Mainly 18–44
Number of MH disorders Positive Highly positive Highly positive Positive
Personality disorders Highly positive Highly positive Highly negative Positive
Drug Abuse Screening Test (DAST) Positive Highly positive Positive Highly negative
Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) Highly negative Highly positive Negative Positive
Severity of needs Highly positive Positive Highly negative Negative
Adequacy of help received Negative Highly negative Highly positive Positive
Alberta Continuity of Services Scale (ACSS) for Mental Health Highly positive Negative Negative Negative
Recovery Self-Assessment Scale (RSA) Highly positive Negative Highly negative Medium
Quality of life (Satisfaction with Life Domains Scale – SLDS) Highly positive Positive Highly negative Negative