Table 6.
Selected EFSA scientific assessments used as examples
| Expressions of uncertainty | EFSA scientific assessments used as examples |
|---|---|
| Unqualified conclusion with no expression of uncertainty | Zearalenone in feed (EFSA CONTAM Panel, 2017) |
| Description of a source of uncertainty | Zearalenone in feed (EFSA CONTAM Panel, 2017) |
| Qualitative descriptions of the direction and/or magnitude of uncertainty | Zearalenone in feed (EFSA CONTAM Panel, 2017) |
| Inconclusive assessment | Zearalenone in feed (EFSA CONTAM Panel, 2017) |
| A precise probability | Nematodes 2017 (EFSA PLH Panel, 2017) |
| An approximate probability |
Animal welfare aspects in respect of the slaughter or killing of pregnant livestock animals (EFSA AHAW Panel, 2017) Listeria monocytogenes in ready‐to‐eat (RTE) foods (EFSA BIOHAZ Panel, 2018) |
| A probability distribution |
Animal welfare aspects in respect of the slaughter or killing of pregnant livestock animals (prevalence) (EFSA AHAW Panel, 2017) Nematodes 2017 (EFSA PLH Panel, 2017) |
| A two‐dimensional probability distribution | IESTI Opinion (EFSA, 2007) |