Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 12;15(6):e0234320. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234320

Table 2. AMTSL with and without WHO SCC utilization.

Study AMTSL without WHO SCC (Number / total and %) AMTSL with WHO SCC (Number/ total and %) P-value
1. Kumar et al. [7] 58/240(24%) 211/240(88%) <0.001
2. Nababan et al. [11] 134/153(88%) 156/157(99%) <0.001
3. Semrau et al. [21] 154/1041(14.8%) 549/1019(53.9%) <0.001
4. Spector et al. [3] 33/338(8.4%) 402/583(68.9%) <0.001
5. Tuyishim et al. [10] 76/92(77.6%) 84/98(84.8%) 0.206
6. Varaganti et al. [12] 600/635(94.5%) 601/620(96.9%) 0.032