Skip to main content
. 2019 May 1;101(9):779–786. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.18.00397

TABLE III.

Patient-Reported Outcomes and Prevalence of Subsequent Ipsilateral Knee Surgery at 2 Years

Baseline 2-Year Follow-up
IKDC* 52 (39, 64) 78 (61, 87)
KOOS*
 Symptoms 68 (54, 82) 79 (68, 89)
 Pain 75 (58, 86) 89 (75, 97)
 Activities of daily living 87 (69, 96) 97 (88, 100)
 Sports/recreation 45 (25, 65) 75 (55, 90)
 Quality of life 31 (19, 44) 62 (44, 75)
Marx activity level (range, 0-16)* 11 (4, 16) 7 (2, 12)
Subsequent ipsilateral knee surgery
 No 82% (694)
 Yes 10% (88)
 Unknown (unable to contact patient) 7% (61)
*

The variables are reported as the median (25th, 75th percentiles).

Revision ACL reconstruction, arthroscopic procedure for meniscal and/or chondral pathology, implant removal, etc.). The variable is reported as the percentage (number).