Skip to main content
. 2020 May 26;12:100286. doi: 10.1016/j.bonr.2020.100286

Table 1.

Overview of FE models for strength assessment in metastatic femurs, validated with experiments on human cadaver femurs (Yosibash et al., 2014; Tanck et al., 2009; Keyak et al., 2005a; Derikx et al., 2012; Benca et al., 2019; Alexander et al., 2013; Keyak et al., 2005b; Spruijt et al., 2006; Cheal et al., 1993).

Study No. of
femurs
Lesion
Mechanical
test
FEA
Validation
Type Location Meshing Material Parameter R2
Cheal et al., 1993 1 Simulated Neck Compression Geometry Linear Failure force “poor”
Keyak et al., 2005a, Keyak et al., 2005b 2005a 24 Real and simulated Shaft 4 point-bending Voxel Linear Failure force 0.88-0.95
2005b 44 Real Proximal femur Compression Voxel Nonlinear Failure force 0.83-0.88
Spruijt et al., 2006 11 pairs Simulated Shaft Torsion Voxel Linear Failure moment 0.68-0.82
Tanck et al., 2009 5 pairs Simulated Proximal femur Compression Voxel Nonlinear Failure force 0.92
Derikx et al., 2012 10 pairs Simulated Proximal femur Compression Geometry Nonlinear Failure force 0.90-0.93
Alexander et al., 2013 8 pairs Simulated Neck Compression Geometry Linear NA
Yosibash et al., 2014 7 pairs Real Proximal femur Compression Geometry Linear Yield force 0.78
Benca et al., 2019 16 pairs Simulated Neck Compression Voxel Nonlinear Failure force 0.77-0.98
Stiffness 0.47-0.94

NA = Not Applicable.