Table 5.

Low- and high-fidelity module evaluations.

		Low Fidelity		High Fidelity
		n	Mean (standard deviation)	n	Mean (standard deviation)
1	Overall, I liked this training	40	4.80 (0.464)	40	4.95 (0.221)
2	The learning atmosphere was pleasant	40	4.60 (0.709)	40	4.90 (0.379)
3	The learning was fun	40	4.65 (0.533)	40	4.85 (0.427)
4	I find the training useful for my degree	40	4.75 (0.679)	40	4.88 (0.404)
5	Investing time in this training was useful	40	4.75 (0.588)	40	4.95 (0.221)
6	I can apply the content of this training in my degree	40	4.65 (0.622)	40	4.95 (0.221)
7	I derive personal use from this training	40	4.65 (0.622)	40	4.90 (0.379)
8	The content was comprehensible	40	4.88 (0.335)	40	4.85 (0.533)
9	The language (foreign words and technical terms) was comprehensible	40	4.83 (0.446)	40	4.97 (0.158)
10	I kept up thematically in the training	40	4.75 (0.543)	40	4.83 (0.501)
11	The time was sufficient for the themes covered	40	4.58 (0.813)	40	4.63 (0.868)
12	I will apply what I leaned to my day-to-day work	40	4.78 (0.480)	40	4.88 (0.335)
13	I find it good that I received feedback after each session	40	4.85 (0.427)	40	4.88 (0.404)
14	I would recommend this training to my colleagues	40	4.93 (0.350)	40	4.97 (0.158)
	OVERALL	40	4.74 (0.393)	40	4.88 (0.290)