Table 2.
tenet | description | example |
---|---|---|
(i) | trade-offs exist | ‘according to LHT, the finite nature of resources available to organisms during evolution induced multiple-trait trade-offs among fitness components such as current versus future reproduction and offspring quality versus quantity’ [21, p. 1] ‘LHT posits that organisms face important trade-offs in how they allocate….resources among the several competing demands of life….’ [22, p. 889] |
(ii) | life-history traits covary between individuals along a fast–slow continuum | ‘LHT suggests that humans fall along a spectrum from early reproduction and allocation of resources toward mating effort, to later reproduction and devotion of resources toward somatic and parental effort…referred to as the fast–to–slow life history continuum’ [23, p. 933] ‘Life history strategies vary along a fast/slow continuum’ [24, p. 23] ‘From the perspective of LHT, a mid-level evolutionary framework, [behavioural] phenotypic variables are conceptualized as indicators of individual differences along a fast–slow LH continuum’ [25, p. 1] |
(iii) | people adapt to their personal environments, especially those of childhood, by becoming ‘faster’ or ‘slower’. | ‘LHT predicts that people calibrate their reproductive strategies to local levels of environmental harshness and unpredictability…’ [26, p. 434] ‘according to LHT….the nature of an individual's childhood environment disposes that individual to adopt a fast or a slow life history strategy….’ [27, p. 621] ‘these ‘fast’ versus ‘slow’ life history trajectories are strategic responses to the particular environment in which people find themselves’ [28, p. 891] ‘according to LHT, exposure to harshness and/or unpredictability early in life should promote a fast life history strategy’ [29, p. 1542] |
(iv) | specific predictions | ‘the evolutionary framework of LHT predicts that preferences for risk and delay in gratification should be influenced by mortality and resource scarcity’ [30, p. 1015] ‘LHT predicts that an array of [crime-related] behaviors will shift in response to life expectancy cues’ [31, p. 12] ‘LHT suggests that adult reward sensitivity should be best explained by childhood, but not current, socioeconomic conditions’ [32, p. 48] ‘the evolutionary framework of LHT predicts that preference for delay of gratification should be influenced by social economic status’ [33, p. 1] |