Table 1.
Method available | Working principle | Advantage | Time required | Disadvantage |
---|---|---|---|---|
Next generation sequencing (NGS) | Whole genome sequencing |
Highly sensitive and specific, Provide all related information; Can identify novel strain |
1–2 day |
High expertise Equipment dependency and high cost Highly sophisticated Lab required |
RT-PCR | Specific primer-probe based detection |
Fast results Higher sensitivity Needs small amount of DNA Can be performed in a single step Well established methodology in viral diagnostics |
3–4 h |
Higher costs due to the use of expensive consumables Expensive lab equipment Detection is also complex and time consuming |
LAMP | More than two sets of specific primers pair based detection |
Highly repeatable and accurate Single working temperature |
1 h | Too sensitive, highly prone to false positives due to carry-over or cross-contamination |
Serological (traditional) | Antigen/Antibodies IgG/IgM | Sensitive and specific | 4–6 h |
Testing come after 3-4 days of infection False positive |
Rapid serological | Antigen/Antibodies IgG/IgM | POCT | 15–30 min |
Testing come after 3-4 days of infection False positive |
CT scan | Chest images | Enhance sensitivity of detection if findings combined with RT-PCR results | 1 h | Indistinguishability from other viral pneumonia and the hysteresis of abnormal CT |
Virus isolation | In vitro live virus isolation and propagation |
Highly (100%) specific Gold standard |
5–15 days | Low sensitivity as isolation is not 100% |