Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 13;9(3):549–562. doi: 10.1007/s40123-020-00269-3

Table 2.

Characteristics of 219 video visit encounters from 18 March through to 27 April 2020

Characteristic n (%)
Visit type
 Routine 117 (53)
 Problem 102 (47)
Subspecialty service
 Cornea 75 (34)
 Retina 59 (27)
 Comprehensive 45 (21)
 Oculoplastics 28 (13)
 Glaucoma 6 (3)
 Adult motility 3 (1)
 Neuro-ophthalmology 2 (1)
 Uveitis 1 (0.5)
Visit diagnosisa
 Postoperative state 20 (9)
 Conjunctivitis 16 (7)
 Keratitis 14 (6)
 Visual discomfort or disturbance 10 (4)
 Iritis 8 (3)
 Cataract 7 (3)
 Age-related macular degeneration 6 (3)
 Corneal ulcer 6 (3)
 Diabetic eye disease 6 (3)
 Dry eye 6 (3)
 Scleritis/episcleritis 6 (3)
 Serous retinal detachment 6 (3)
 Glaucoma 5 (2)
 Herpetic eye disease 5 (2)
 Retinal hole 5 (2)
 Chalazion 4 (2)
 Thyroid eye disease 4 (2)
 Blepharitis 3 (1)
 Epiphora 3 (1)
 Eyelid disorder 3 (1)
 Eyelid edema 3 (1)
 Orbital fracture 3 (1)
 Other oculoplastic disorder 3 (1)
 Diagnoses unique to ≤ 2 encounters 64 (28)
 Unspecified diagnosis 15 (6)
Triage acuity level of diagnosisb
 Low 33 (15)
 Moderate 151 (69)
 High 35 (16)

For patients who participated in more than one video visit over this timeframe, only characteristics of the first video visit encounter were included; n refers to number of video visit encounters

aIncludes only diagnoses made in > 2 encounters

bTriage acuity level of diagnosis was determined by referencing consensus of the larger ophthalmology community (available at https://eyewiki.org/Coronavirus_(COVID-19)#Triage_and_Scheduling_Staff)