Table 2.
Results of the external validation using CT data sets from two institutions for each of the 8 training models.
Model | Institution 1 (n = 60) | Institution 2 (n = 40) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sensitivity | Specificity | Accuracy | Sensitivity | Specificity | Accuracy | |
1 | 88.5 | 91.2 | 90.0 | 90.0 | 90.0 | 90.0 |
2 | 88.5 | 91.2 | 90.0 | 95.0 | 80.0 | 87.5 |
3 | 92.3 | 88.2 | 90.0 | 95.0 | 100.0 | 97.5 |
4 | 80.8 | 91.2 | 86.7 | 95.0 | 95.0 | 95.0 |
5 | 88.5 | 94.1 | 92.0 | 95.0 | 95.0 | 95.0 |
6 | 88.5 | 88.2 | 88.3 | 90.0 | 95.0 | 92.5 |
7 | 88.5 | 88.2 | 88.3 | 90.0 | 90.0 | 90.0 |
8 | 88.5 | 91.2 | 90.0 | 90.0 | 90.0 | 90.0 |
Average | 88.5 | 91.2 | 90.0 | 95.0 | 100.0 | 97.5 |