Table 1.
National | Orthodox | Religious | Traditional | Secular | Arab | |
Vaccination coverage (ν) | 72.1% | 78.1% | 63.6% | 72.3% | 63.7% | 88.0% |
Comprehended campaign as prosocial (α) | 54.8% | 48.4% | 56.2% | 63.6% | 66.8% | 25.5% |
Estimated comprehensors that are prosocial (ρ)† | 69.7% | 74.5% | 61.6% | 71.1% | 63.1% | 80.2% |
Minimum strength of prosocial behavior (κ) | 0.24 | 0.27 | 0.21 | 0.24 | 0.21 | 0.32 |
Estimated strength of prosocial behavior (κ)‡ | 0.59 | 0.63 | 0.53 | 0.59 | 0.53 | 0.72 |
Sensitivity to infection (γ) | 0.076 | 0.085 | 0.064 | 0.076 | 0.064 | 0.101 |
We assumed a vaccine efficacy of 63%, 94% of the population is eligible for vaccination, the perceived basic reproductive number to be 2.24, the relative risk for an unaware individuals to be ∼2.14 × 10−4, the relative risk for an aware individual to be 0.001, and evaluating the probability of infection as R0(1 − εν)1/γ/(R0+(1 − εν)1/γ).
The percentage of the eligible population that is prosocial for the different sociocultural groups was estimated based on the assumption that unaware individuals were ∼1.22 times more likely to vaccinate than an aware individual (SI Appendix, Validation). Since 94% of the population was assumed eligible for vaccination (i.e., ω = 0.94), ωαρ represents the proportion of prosocials reported in the survey.
Estimated using Eq. 4.