Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 9;41(10):2762–2781. doi: 10.1002/hbm.24976

Table 7.

Relationship between the neurocognitive performance and mGluR5 receptor binding exploratory examined by calculating Spearman's rank correlation coefficient between scores reached in the neurocognitive tests and BPND for the seven observed brain regions in the patient group

Left prefrontal gyrus Right prefrontal Gyrus Left temporal Right temporal Caudate Putamen Inferior frontal gyrus
Subjects N 15 15 15 15 15 15 15
TMT(A) (s) r −.408 −.445 −.544 −.423 −.571 −.449 −.486
p .131 .096 .036 .117 .026 .093 .066
CT r .531 .550 .750* .615 .665* .517 .576
p .042 .033 .001* .015 .007* .049 .025
LNS (sum score) r −.051 −.114 .082 .028 −.022 −.069 −.035
p .857 .685 .772 .921 .939 .807 .903
LNS (longest sequence) r −.090 −.145 .016 −.081 .039 −.125 −.065
p .749 .607 .955 .773 .891 .658 .817
CBT—forward r .164 .190 .311 .216 .222 .170 .221
p .559 .497 .259 .439 .426 .545 .429
CBT—backward r .283 .322 .245 .191 .524 .255 .330
p .307 .242 .378 .495 .045 .359 .230
RVDLT valid recognitions r .193 .209 .164 .079 .363 .241 .220
p .490 .454 .560 .780 .183 .386 .430
RVDLT—errors r −.048 −.074 .026 .084 −.204 −.097 −.015
p .866 .794 .927 .765 .466 .731 .957
Z‐composite score r .288 .307 .433 .300 .500 .321 .322
p .298 .265 .107 .277 .057 .243 .242
TMT(B) (s) r −.203 −.279 −.392 −.398 −.341 −.385 .304
p .487 .334 .166 .158 .233 .175 .291
TMT(B)–TMT(A) r −.161 −.231 −.315 −.343 −.271 −.358 −.264
p .583 .427 .273 .230 .349 .208 .361
TMT(B)/TMT(A) r .242 .169 .103 .075 .084 .055 .123
p .404 .563 .725 .799 .776 .852 .674

Note: *Significant correlations after Bonferroni correction (p < .0083).

Abbreviations: CBT, Corsi block‐tapping task; CT, Number‐symbol coding task; LNS, Letter–Number Span (LNS); RVDLT, Rey Visual Design Learning Test; TMT(A), Trail‐Making Test (A); TMT(B), Trail‐Making Test (B).